.Google.com's Martin Splitt responded to a concern in the SEO Office Hrs podcast concerning whether recreating YouTube online video content into message on a website will be considered replicate material and possess an adverse influence on the web page positions.Although reproduce material is actually certainly not a bad ranking factor, content published on an extra reliable website may create the material on the much less reliable internet site to become outranked. It's a valid question to inquire since content on an authoritative will certainly out perform the same material on a less authoritative one.Some in the search area pertain to one piece of information laying hold of the rankings of one more as 'cannibalization' of the page's ranking possibility. This is actually the worry of the person asking the question.Google.com's Martin Splitt reported the submitted concern:." If I produce a YouTube video and after that take that exact content or even content and location it on a websites, could Google banner that web page or internet site for replicate material?".Different Information Media Are Actually Managed As Different.Martin Splitt responded to that the two forms of material are various and also are going to not be actually alleviated as the exact same web content, thus publishing message content extracted from a video clip will certainly certainly not be actually taken into consideration duplicate material.This is his response:." No, one is actually a video recording and also the various other one is message material, and that will be actually unique content!".Publishing Extracted Text Coming From Video.Martin complimented the concept of extracting text content coming from a video recording as well as republishing it as content, taking note that some individuals choose to take in information in text message kind instead of watching a video clip. Switching the flow of content from message to sound or online video is actually probably not a bad suggestion also since some folks have issue going through message web content and might prefer listening to it from a video recording or a podcast layout.Martin talked about printing video clip web content in a textual version:." It's also certainly not a negative suggestion, some users (like me) could like a text variation and others may certainly not have the capacity to make use of an online video variation of the information in the first place due to data transfer or aesthetic restraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion responsible for the concern is repurposing web content and also it is actually a great idea. Browse is actually much more than Google.com, it's also YouTube as well as anywhere folks acquire their audio information, like Spotify. The reality that there is actually no cannibalization of the web content in between mediums helps make repurposing a practical strategy to stretching your content reach.Pay attention to the podcast at the 8:20 min score:.Included Picture by Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.